The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Illustrated in the map is the ways to get to the city hospital throughout a phase of three years between 2007 and 2010.
To put it in a nutshell, the city hospital witnessed significant changes with the move of the bus stop together with the separation of the car park. There is no questioning of the fact that the area around the hospital was developed totally.
As can be seen from the maps, the bus stop was moved from the right of the hospital to the right of Hospital Road, opposite the new staff car park. Talking of the ahead of the hospital, two new roundabouts were built on the Hospital Road. Additionally, the car park was used for both staff and public in 2007 but in 2010 there was an extension of the car park next to the city hospital.
Moving on to the center of this building, trees were cut down to clear a space for a new bus stop and staff car park. Moreover, there was the third roundabout in the southeast of the map.
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 90
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, third, talking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34269662921 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40387081067 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3215355339 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148570644289 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745282783728 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529621547281 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101046450827 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610800793057 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.