The maps above explain several changes which were made to the infrastructure around the City Hospital. In general, reconstructions involved the building of the Bus Station, the segregation of Car Park, and the construction of Roundabouts.
In detail, it is seen that in 2007 there were several bus stops along the Hospital Road. Three years later, the bus stops were no longer present and as a replacement, a new Bus Station was constructed on the southwestern side of the map. Furthermore, there were two Roundabouts which gave access to the Bus Station. The first Roundabout was constructed in the intersection of City Road and Hospital Road, while the second was built in three-way-intersection of Ring Road and Hospital Road.
Lastly, changes also included the separation of Car Park. Previously, in 2007, the staff and public used the same Car Park, which was situated in the southeastern side of the map. But in 2010, the Car Park was separated into Staff Car Park and Public Car Park. The former Car Park was only used for Staff Car Park, while the Public Car Park was built in the east side of the map.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by select the main features and make comparisons when relevant
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, lastly, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84816753927 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99723472968 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492146596859 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0130857171 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117449276853 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056365061453 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497979439589 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817904593145 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570819585183 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.