The maps below depict the road access to a City Hospital in two different years, 2007 and 2010. Overall, it is noticeable that there are a lot of modifications made in 3 years.
In detail, it can be seen that several Bus Stops which were used to be there along the Hospital Road in 2007 have been replaced by two Roundabouts in 2010. The first Roundabout was located in the three-way-intersection of Ring Road and Hospital Road, where the second Roundabout was placed in four-way-intersection of City Road and Hospital Road. Moreover, in 2010 a new Bus Station has been built on the southwestern side of the map and could be accessed through both Roundabouts.
Lastly, a modification to Car Park was also done in 2010. The previous Car Park which was used by both Staffs and Public in 2007 was then used only for Staffs in 2010. As a replacement, in 2010, a new Car Park was constructed for Public on the east side of the map. Both new Public and Staff Car Parks could be accessed through Ring Road.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55801104972 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03134223467 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2062583422 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390050855933 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176076304003 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196495691508 0.0843802449381 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314673541144 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148807014257 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.