The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The map shows differences between the city around the hospital in 2007 and 2010. There are many differences between two years, especially on the road to reach the city hospital while the hospital building remains. Ring road surrounds the hospital and connected to hospital road which is access way to hospital.
In 2007, the hospital road which was connected with the ring road from south had three bus stations on each side. Parking lot for both staff and public was located in the east side of hospital road. And it was connected to the ring road.
In 2010, new car park only for the public was constructed in the right side of ring road and connected with it. And car park that was existed in 2007 changed to staff only. Two roundabouts were also constructed at the joint of the roads. Bus stops were moved to left side of hospital road and accessed by roundabout.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Essay topics: The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66451612903 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33842267427 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7140412517 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24252997618 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116207505305 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077412930358 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181345949687 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900100075283 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.21 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.