The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how the road access to a city hospital had changed over a period of time(from 2007 to 2010 ).
Overall, there was a significant increase in the parking space, allowing markedly more vehicles to be parked around the hospital. Furthermore, a large bus station was built by Hospital Road, replacing the former smaller bus stops.
In 2007, there was only one parking lot for both staff and public vehicles, which was situated on the east side of Hospital Road, between City road and Ring Road that circled around the hospital. And there were 6 small bus stops lining along both sides of Hospital Road.
While in 2010, the previous parking lot became a staff car lot and a slightly larger public car parking appeared on the east side of the hospital. And the previous bus stops were replaced by a large bus station that lied on the west side the Hospital Road. Another significant change in 2010 was the two road circle on both ends of Hospital Road, which connected this road to City Road and Ring Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d over a period of timefrom 2007 to 2010 . Overall, there was a significant incr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67777777778 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29478049513 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1922414445 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203341651972 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105390160894 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878306293068 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154919306537 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808923427644 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.