The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1995 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps give information about the changes of a school campus in 1985 and 2012.
It is clear that the school campus witness radical change with the most noticeable bending the playing field and car park in the entrance.
The school campus was designed in 1985 including two car park, office, library, classroom block and playing field. The playing field directly accessible campus and opposite with the car park. Look at the map in 2012, the school campus have the resource and classroom replaced to library and car park and playing field at the bottom.
While the entrance remain in the bottom, it is become more spacious and go to the next to the playing field we will see swimming pool and fitness club on the right and four classroom above the playing field. Meanwhile,compared to the present, today the schools have few new places ( 6 areas) the resources, two classrooms and three classrooms block, swimming pool and fitness club. Besides, in 2012 the school experienced substantial increase in enrollment, with an estimated 2,300 student but this figure represented a nearly two fold rise from the 1,500 students in 1985. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. So, it can be seen that the school in 2012 is modern than 1985.
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025 73
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- The advantages brought the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages Tow what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- In some country it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants Is this positive or negative development 78
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'park' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
... was designed in 1985 including two car park, office, library, classroom block and p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'classroom' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'classrooms'.
Suggestion: classrooms
... and fitness club on the right and four classroom above the playing field. Meanwhile,comp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
...sroom above the playing field. Meanwhile,compared to the present, today the schools have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, today the schools have few new places 6 areas the resources, two classrooms an...
^^
Line 4, column 534, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
...is figure represented a nearly two fold rise from the 1,500 students in 1985. Summar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94545454545 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6046525442 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5919520948 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281802237233 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137106769894 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130823171966 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197081919307 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998893806343 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.