Topic: The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to four countries from 1990 to 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of Australian exports to primary four nations, including Japan, the US, China, and India between 1990 and 2012.
In general, it is apparent that there was an increase in the ratio of Australian exports to China and India, whereas the converse was true in regards to Japan and the US. Noticeably, the proportion of Australian exports to China increased dramatically and making up the highest ratio among the four importing countries.
Looking at the chart, Japan was the largest importer of Australia, accounting for approximately 25 percent of the total exports in 1990. This figure surpassed far away although the US was placed the second largest importer, which was roughly three times greater than the ratio of the US. Nevertheless, the percentage of Australian exports to Japan underwent a substantial plummet by merely one-in-ten until 2005 before experiencing a fluctuation and maintaining the percentage til the end of the period. Meanwhile, the trend was true when it came to the proportion of Australian exports to the US. There was a significant fluctuation throughout the period with the peak point being merely 13 percent in 2000. However, the ratio declined steadily to stand at around 7 percent in 2012.
Turning to China and India, both importing nations accounted for a tiny percentage of the total exporting value of Australia in 1990, which was roughly 3 percent. Surprisingly, both of them witnessed a dramatic growth, particularly the exporting to China. The percentage of Australian exports to China saw a rocket rise throughout the examined period to reach the peak at approximately a third in 2012. In the meantime, the ratio of India leveled off towards 2000 and then experienced an upward trend to hit a high of 8 percent before plunging by 3 percent at the end of the timeframe.
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Topic Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...nd India, whereas the converse was true in regards to Japan and the US. Noticeably, the propo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, second, then, third, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 304.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94504725329 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1471768365 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153243750058 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066882938103 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535338228804 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120785337872 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382367966134 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.