The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.
The given pie charts illustrate the percentages of annual expenditure for various purposes by governments in two nations, namely Italy and Spain in 1990.
It is immediately obvious that in both of countries, the governments spent more on higher education than on other categories. Besides, the percentage of expenditures for environmental services and other purposes were similar lowest in 1990.
Regarding the government spending on higher education, Spain had the highest percentage, at 45%, and much higher than Italy 10%. By contrast, Italy domonated the category of K-12 education, with the spending of 25%, and much higher than Spain 5%.
The proportion of spending on transportation in Italy made up 16%, while the figure for Spain were 6%. The expenditure on the category of health in Italy account for 14% and much lower than the figure for Spain 6%. Turning to environmental services and other expenditure, which were the lowest among all the categories, in both of nations, governments spending on these categories were relatively similar, below 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 56
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nual expenditure for various purposes by governments in two nations, namely Italy...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36904761905 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00507412913 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7066385678 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308007710545 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138463346786 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105398167847 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199919465122 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121473538347 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.