The given two pie charts compare the global public changes which occurred in more than six nations from 1900 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that Asia changes the highest proportion of public in both years. Whereas, the major changes also I saw in the europe (including Russia) in population over the 10 years.
In details, There was a significant rise in the total world population from 1,600 million to 6 billion in given 10 years. Apart from this, in 1900, Asia had the maximum public among all the regions (60%). Which was decreased by 6% and reached at 54% in 2000. While, a quarter of population in europe (including Russia) in 1900. In 2000, it was also fall and stood at 14%.
Unlikely north america, There was a increasing trend was observed in all other three nations. North america remained the same at 5% in both years. By contrast, Africa had 4.5% in 1900, but in 2000, grew and stood at 10%. Other region had 2.5% in 1900, and in 2000, it had 3%. In comparison, Latin america and middle east had less than 9% of population between 1900 and 2000 respectively.
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in England that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004 59
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in australia The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chat shows 67
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...est proportion of public in both years. Whereas, the major changes also I saw in the eu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eased by 6% and reached at 54% in 2000. While, a quarter of population in europe incl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
...ng Russia in 1900. In 2000, it was also fall and stood at 14%. Unlikely north am...
^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... Unlikely north america, There was a increasing trend was observed in all ot...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58031088083 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34381375364 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4985786818 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.0 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8461538462 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203172361946 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753153731762 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561958305658 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128180583844 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412499468757 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.