The pie charts illustrate the percentages of online shopping sales for four certain retail sectors in Canada in two years (2005 and 2010).
Overall, electronics & appliance had the highest expenditure among the sectors in 2005 but food & beverage overtook it in 2010 whereas the least amount of money were spent on video games in 2005 and on home furnishings by 2010.
In 2005, the percentage items bought online from electronics & appliance sector was 35, ten percent larger than that of home furnishings. Instead, online sales from video games and food & beverage were less profitable compared to the other two sectors, presenting figures of 18 and 22 percent respectively.
However, the situation quite changed in the following five years when food & beverage and video games climbed at the figures of 32% and 23% respectively while home furnishings and electronics & appliance saw a decline in expenditure on the Internet. In fact, electronics & appliance items decreased of 5 percent compared to the value by 2005 whereas the other sector dropped more, exactly of 10 percent.
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in Canada in two years 2005 and 2010. Overall, electronics & appliance had the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29651162791 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83826374422 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9911607283 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198920902825 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123404132987 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140768907343 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167649072282 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154214936772 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.