The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The given pie chart describes the online sales of retail sectors in Canada by the year 2005 and 2010. It also shows the percentage of sales with respect to the departments in those years.
In 2005 sales of video games is at bottom when compared to all other. However, electronics & appliances remains at the top.
When it comes to 2010 those peak and low places were replaced by the good & beverages and home furnishings.
When we compare the department wise video games sales hiked from 18 % to 23%, food & beverages upsurge by 10 % in 2010 when compared to 2005.However, electronics & appliances, home furnishings sales have a down fall of 5 and 10 %.
In conclusion, retails sales of food & beverages, video games raised over the years. When it comes to home furnishings and electronics & appliances we see the shrink.
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Transport preferences among young people from different countries 56
- The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...e by 10 % in 2010 when compared to 2005.However, electronics & appliances, home furnish...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 685.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96376811594 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81170543355 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1731130575 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.625 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24700905896 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119745544341 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162386322765 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144820430216 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15580412688 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.