The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.
The pie charts indicate the proportion of male and female in 6 types of occupation, divided into groups manual and non-manual, in Britain in 1992. Overall, there was a major difference that female mostly working in non-manual, while most of male working in both manual and non-manual jobs.
To begin, it is clear that managerial and professional had the highest number of men working, at 36%, compared with 29% of women. In the other hand, the figure for men and women working in other manual was mostly the same, at 26% and 27% respectively. Similarly, only a few employee were general labourers.
Regarding from the charts, 31% of women chose to work in clerical or related. This figure was fivefold the percentage of men in this career. In contrast, only 3% of women working in craft or similar, while the figure for men was significantly higher, at 24%. Finally, there was a minor percentage of both genders preferred to work in other non-manual.
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981. 67
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 84
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 83
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U S state of Oregon 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'few employees'.
Suggestion: few employees
...and 27% respectively. Similarly, only a few employee were general labourers. Regarding fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'if', 'regarding', 'similarly', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216494845361 0.268076937826 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.128865979381 0.116061578633 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118556701031 0.0759168565197 156% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412371134021 0.0366838410393 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00515463917526 0.0131127313244 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.170103092784 0.155750635184 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0515463917526 0.0379272487307 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73563228388 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0154639175258 0.0210936926555 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0824742268041 0.0948980150116 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 955.0 1161.00487805 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85889570552 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337423312883 0.337110787985 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245398773006 0.247514529752 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171779141104 0.171178102325 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110429447853 0.112407865282 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73563228388 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.546246751206 104% => OK
Word variations: 48.7401735406 49.3433353143 99% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1111111111 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3629112518 42.9750493124 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 135.714022679 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 42.6509884117 47.7609492067 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.5 2.94281807926 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247342641027 0.418131533498 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136177324994 0.181151798455 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.119857387689 0.0850326197045 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619445333621 0.706616315825 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175073702467 0.157042692854 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12513340308 0.228904883108 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905240603905 0.108899403657 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.359144057257 0.367819155151 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0343973293545 0.0812612215331 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186841822065 0.316326947829 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046304305409 0.0921553760075 50% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.08536585366 171% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.