The pie charts indicate the proportion of male and female in 6 types of occupation, divided into groups manual and non-manual, in Britain in 1992. Overall, there was a major difference that female mostly working in non-manual, while most of male working in both manual and non-manual jobs.
To begin, it is clear that managerial and professional had the highest number of men working, at 36%, compared with 29% of women. In the other hand, the figure for men and women working in other manual was mostly the same, at 26% and 27% respectively. Similarly, only a few employee were general labourers.
Regarding from the charts, 31% of women chose to work in clerical or related. This figure was fivefold the percentage of men in this career. In contrast, only 3% of women working in craft or similar, while the figure for men was significantly higher, at 24%. Finally, there was a minor percentage of both genders preferred to work in other non-manual.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 65
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 11
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'few employees'.
Suggestion: few employees
...and 27% respectively. Similarly, only a few employee were general labourers. Regarding fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87116564417 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73563228388 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3629112518 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2222222222 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0402091016378 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187092176801 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529176587693 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0276516753528 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391053743063 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.