The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

Essay topics:

The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

The given cyclic charts picturise the information about five main sources of energy provided by usa during the 1980 and 1990.The is calibrated in percentum.

It can be seen that for the year 1980, oil was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed souce of energy in the USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric power were noticed to be 26%, 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover nuclear energy had a small fraction from rest of the sources of energy.

Similarly, in second diagram, in year 1990 the highest statistical data in oil (35%), while as minimum contribution in nuclear power(10%). Besides, 25% data was running in natural gas. Furthermore, neither in coal nor be hydroelectric power data were noticed in 27% and 5%.

Overall, it is evident that, there was Hydroelectric power remained static for both the years.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 Spring2019 61 view
2019-11-27 tiendung00001 56 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 84 view
2019-10-05 Kamal1993 67 view
2019-09-20 green1222 78 view
Essays by user Prince gill :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rovided by usa during the 1980 and 1990.The is calibrated in percentum. It can b...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was covering 42% of the whole pie chart , which makes it most consumed souce of e...
^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f energy in the USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric pow...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e USA. In addition to this , natural gas ,coal and hydroelectric power were notice...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ced to be 26%, 22% and 5% respectively. Moreover nuclear energy had a small fraction fro...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94520547945 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77283994202 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.678082191781 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2955900955 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167188450716 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643441918642 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884754481756 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100683353359 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103300464493 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.