Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.what do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more people to take interest in arts.
Yes of course, art is significant part of all culture throughout the world. But today the topic asserts that, there are fewer people, who are interested in art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. I am strong advocate of this approach and through this essay, I am going to examine some reasons with the following paragraph.
Why, it is happening? So many points are there regarding to this statement. While it is true, art is enriched culture, it plays little or no more improving our lives. First of all, in many countries number of people believe that art is only wastage of time as well as it just entertain to us. So that, they totally lose their interest in art, because they think that,future is not secure in this field. Needless to say that, individuals are showing their interest in science than in art and business also create more jobs and they can earn high salary packages. Take for instance, if we think, life is impossible and uncomfortable without technology. Due to advanced technology our life become more easy and better. In addition to this, government provide so many opportunities in this field. So that, the people gives the first preference in science and business.
Apart from that, another reason is diminishing the popularity of art is that, it has lost the patronage of government. During the monarchy artists enjoyed considerable attention. While governments still support art and artists no special incentive is given to produce masterpieces of art.
Art and culture co-exist. One cannot survive without the other. That explains the importance of preserving art. One way of doing this is to make art a viable career option. The government should create jobs in this sector by opening more and more art galleries and organizing exhibitions and cultural programmes. This will encourage more students to pursue art at school and colleges.
To conclude, the most effective way to nurture art is to capitalize on its economic potential. The government can do this by creating jobs in this sector.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-13 | Akshay dantani | 89 | view |
2018-09-07 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
2018-09-07 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
2018-09-07 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
2018-09-07 | Prince gill | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 56
- Some people believe they should keep all the money, they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the art and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view. 67
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and the rest of the worldwide. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , future
...interest in art, because they think that,future is not secure in this field. Needless t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, still, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, of course, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00877192982 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74687799815 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7712287514 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.375 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247385222902 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719672898688 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684030411472 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140347570001 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701027834421 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.