The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

Essay topics:

The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

The given circular charts reveal the information about the 5 significant sources of energy by USA in 80's and 90's. It is caliberated in per centum.

It is clearly seen that oil was the main source of energy in the 1980. Which is 42% of the total. In addition to this, over a quarter had been covered by the natural gas in the 1980s. Furthermore, coal, hydroelectric power as well as nuclear power were the sources of energy. Which were about 22%, 5% and 5% respectively.

Secondly, in the 1990s: the main contribution in the energy was shown by natural gas which was 33% of the total. Apart from this, natural gas had covered exactly the quarter in the 1990. Coal in 1990 was the second largest source of energy. There was no change in the popularity of the hydroelectric power as their contribution remained the same in both 80's and 90's but contribution of the natural get declined by 1% in comparison of the 1980s. Nuclear power the greatest change: in 1990 it was 10% , twice that of 1980s.

Overall, it is evident that oil leads and hydroelectric power lacks as the sources of energy in both 80's and 90's.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 Spring2019 61 view
2019-11-27 tiendung00001 56 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 84 view
2019-10-05 Kamal1993 67 view
2019-09-20 green1222 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the main source of energy in the 1980. Which is 42% of the total. In addition to thi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the greatest change: in 1990 it was 10% , twice that of 1980s. Overall, it is ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55223880597 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64605233907 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467661691542 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3829489089 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3846153846 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138545628665 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479643344283 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566674167293 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899345157463 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334990807634 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.