The two pie charts shows the online sale of different sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010.
The given two pie charts compare the percentage of online sales for four different sectors such as electronic and appliance, food and beverage, home furnishings and video games in Canada in two different years, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, In both years, the stock of video games and food as beverages increased whereas the sale of other two sectors like electronic and appliances as well as home furnishing dropped in two years.
Going back to the significant consideration of pie chart, In 2005, the online sale of video games was only 18% which, however increased up to 23% in 2010. Similarly, food and beverages were sold by 22% in 2015 which rose by ten percent in 2010.
On the other hand, the online sale of electronic and appliances which was 35% in Canada in 2005 decreased by five percent in 2010 (30%). Furthermore,the sale of home furnished also decreased from 25% to 15% between 2005 to 2010 respectively.
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 67
- People listen to music for different reasons and at different times. Why is music important to many people? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 61
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different countries in the US state of oregon. 61
- You have recently purchased a gift item for one of your friends Write a letter to this friend In your letter tell him her about the gift tell how you want to sent the gift to this friend explain why you chose this gift for your friend
- Some people think money is the best gift to give to youngsters, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...by five percent in 2010 30%. Furthermore,the sale of home furnished also decreased f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89808917197 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73160052824 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3655065333 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.6666666667 5.23603664747 318% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451607054101 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221257697793 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14836437385 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279604766638 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141500791045 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.