The two tables show the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment.
The given two pictures depict comparative total guess who visit Ashdown Museum. It describes the different year of before and after reconstruction. The amount of gap is 74.000 before and 92.000 after fixation.
Frist of all the two pie charts show off the various options to deliver the description of visitors opinion. The scales are very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, and no response. The first chart seems that most tourist choose dominantly in dissatisfaction, it also achieved the hugest rate 40%. By contrast, 5% people do not give their response at all.
Furthermore, It is clearly makes a change of the guess’observation over their mark. The option “very satisfied” has peaked by time and reaches 35% when the previous percentage only acquire 15%. Therefore it increases 20% by a good progress. Moreover, the dramatic rate also turns from dissatisfied to satisfied. Those have similar number in 40%. Meanwhile, the dissatisfaction just takes 15% of all. Related to this, the visitors obviously represent the satisfaction consideration about this new construction of museum.
- several people are declaring the tv programme have to restrict the description about crime. 84
- using telephone calls 11
- Development plan for Islip Town Centre 78
- Fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary school 78
- city planners new designs include setting up schools markets and commercial places like office in different areas of the city do you think it will help the city dwellers give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e previous percentage only acquire 15%. Therefore it increases 20% by a good progress. Mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good progress'.
Suggestion: good progress
...uire 15%. Therefore it increases 20% by a good progress. Moreover, the dramatic rate also turns...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56395348837 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43458533446 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.726744186047 0.547539520022 133% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3548115381 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.3571428571 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.2857142857 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202465443023 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535744370594 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657620601682 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128474198808 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863967223839 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.08 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.