the prediction of total population in india and china in 2000 to 2050
The presented line graph depicts speculation of society development in India and China from 2000 to 2050. It calculates by a number of populations as comparative.
It is clear that the two crossed lines are distinguishing the gap of trend. India has undergone a huge progress along predictive period. It is proved by reaching sophisticated number from 1000 to more than 1500. In the opposite figure, China represents fluctuative path for the same years. As we know that the middle of 2020 and 2030 is being the most salient change. Markedly, it climbed to 1450 but decreasing afterward.
If we observe more closely, we can point out the similar rate between India and China in 2030. Related to this, around 1450 people stay in their own nation, however, the next motion is running contrast. At the final, in the edge of the year population in India has remarkably rocketed to almost 1600 billions, whereas the Chinese declined into less than 1400.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | lee giang | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | accclone | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view |
- CELEBRITY 56
- Development plan for Islip Town Centre 78
- The comparation among three pie charts to dicusse the most stuff percentage 84
- the prediction of total population in india and china in 2000 to 2050 78
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge progress'.
Suggestion: huge progress
...g the gap of trend. India has undergone a huge progress along predictive period. It is proved b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93167701863 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71814186618 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689440993789 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2553293445 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1818181818 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262948911232 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758569205036 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087232575637 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18194578684 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100614126721 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.