UK school's expenditure
The given charts indicate the proportion of a school’s expenditure per year in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It is clear that this UK spent most on paying salaries for its teachers in three research years. Additionally, while the totals for expenditure in these years were similar, there were small differences in change of each constituent’s percentage.
Teacher’s wages accounted for 40% of total school spending in 1981 which was the highest rate shown in the first chart. This item raised to 50% in 1991 and declined slightly to 45% in 2001. By contrast, the UK school spent least on insurance in 1981, 1991 and 2001 with a consistently increasing trend, at 2%, 3% and 8% respectively.
On the other hand, the proportion of other employee’s salaries always stood at a quite high level in school’s spending in three years and witnessed a gradual decrease from 28% in 1981 to 22% in 1991 and 15% in 2001. While the figure for furniture and equipment still remained at the same percentage of 5% in 1991 and 2001, the rate of spent resources experienced a rapid decline in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-19 | Phan Thị Minh Thiện | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...45% in 2001. By contrast, the UK school spent least on insurance in 1981, 1991 and 2001 wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91005291005 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0705249572 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9928813814 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307502076933 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138137925369 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126102985493 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224701178304 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120741611143 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.