water usage in the USA states and worldwide
The pie charts illustrate the comparison of how much water two states of the USA and the world use in terms of percentage.
Evidently, the water usage by residents in San Diego made up a largest contribution - over 60%, in contrast aqua usage for agricultural purpose is the least sector - 17%. At the same time, industrial accounted for 23% of aqua use.
comparing with the same purposes in California, different segments are relatively similar to those, which are in San Diego, but still are diverse by approximately 10-20% for each; meanwhile, residential purpose is still the largest sector, 39%, which is smaller at 21%, in comparison to contribution in another state, mentioned above. With regards to agricultural and industrial sectors, they made up a smaller part of the chart at about 28 and 33%, respectively.
In contrast, the worldwide agriculture is the most significant part of aqua use, that is nearly 69%, yet the states have a lower percentage of it, at about three times. Whilst the same proportion of water (23%) is used for industry in both San Diego and the whole word, it accounted for only 8% of residential purpose, which is the smallest contribution, comparing with other selected cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | zee7 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | eyraen | 40 | view |
- town of Hillingford between 2000 and 2015 92
- Modern architecture has made cities more attractive in the last century 80
- The charts show projections for global production by sector in 2030 and 2050 67
- How tomatos ketchup made. 73
- the graph shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...usage by residents in San Diego made up a largest contribution - over 60%, in con...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Comparing
...al accounted for 23% of aqua use. comparing with the same purposes in California, d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07920792079 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93215528274 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9492156244 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191827243046 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848751112858 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817463570273 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126421828618 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706532459766 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.