The graph provides the information about internet usage in Taiwan by different age level between 1990 and 2000.
Overall, From the beginning to the end, youths were more engaged in using internet. It also shows that the lowest percentage of people using internet were under 15 years.
In the initial year, there were 53% of youths age between 16 to 30 years were found using internet. In the next year, it was declined to 45%. Similarly, In 2000, there was a modest fall in percentage by 1%. In 1998 there were only 2% of internet users who were under 15 years and in 1999 it roses by 6%. Finally, In 2000, it reaches 9% by increasing slightly by 1%.
In the mid age 31 to 50 years their were 41% of internet users in 1998. Then, In the following year, it decreases slightly by 2%. At the end of year, it stopped after declining to 37 percent. Whereas, In 1998, 4% of Taiwan people who were more than 50 years were found using internet. Similarly, it increases by double in 1999. Ultimately, the percentage again increased by 2% reaching 10% in 2000.
- the charts below show the UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008. 56
- the chart below show the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 projection for 2050. 73
- The diagram shows the process of making recycled paper from old newspaper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 72
- writing task 1 bar chart 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2%. At the end of year, it stopped after declining to 37 percent. Whereas, In 199...
^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clining to 37 percent. Whereas, In 1998, 4% of Taiwan people who were more than 5...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, similarly, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53125 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41271228197 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5356832298 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.1428571429 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7142857143 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.4 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.