the given bar graphs provide the information of proportion of world population to 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and predictions for 2050.
Overall, the volume of the Chinese population was noticeably higher as compare to other countries, however, the prediction for the future will shrink. In addition, the number of Indian citizens was growing and likely to increase in the coming year. Moreover, the Japanese tended to decrease and even in the future. Also, the USA would try to keep stable the trend.
For further description, the Chinese population has been decreasing constantly. It was above 20 percent in 1950, however, it went down to 20 percent in 2002 and will be even worse in 2050 which about 15%. on the other hand, the volume of Indian citizens was increased from 15 percent in 1950 to above 15% in 2002 and it will tend to fractional increase in 2050. The USA holds below 10% and 5% of world's population in 1950 and 2002 respectively and predicted as remain same as in 2050. Inarguably, the Japanese possessed and will be possessed less than 5% of the entire population.
- University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies Do the advantages of studying abroad outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience Write at least 2
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money What is your opinion 91
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given bar graphs provide the informatio...
^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...02 and predictions for 2050. Overall, the volume of the Chinese population was...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hinese population was noticeably higher as compare to other countries, however, th...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... be even worse in 2050 which about 15%. on the other hand, the volume of Indian ci...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed from 15 percent in 1950 to above 15% in 2002 and it will tend to fractional i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80319148936 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68588580757 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5608159626 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201934801183 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794596899512 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090219903 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168374956912 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102732664181 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.