The give bar graph provides information about how consumers in the US, Canada, UK, and Japan allocated the share of spending on food, housing, transportation, healthcare and clothing in the year 2009.
General speaking, according to the chart, housing and food occupied the main outlay, in contrast, health care, and clothing accounted for the lower index in comparison to the other three group.
As you can see, Japan spent around 23% money on food and this ratio was higher than the other nationalities. Uk’s residents used about one-fifth their purchase in food, as regards to the US and Canada this figure below 15%. Housing was an average drained of the highest proportion of money. In America, inhabitants expense more than one-fourth of their budget for accommodation, compared to the other countries, this rate between 22% to 24%.
On the other hand, transportation cost was the highest in Canada, one-fifth of people’s fund used for commuting. But, the lowest rate belonged to Japan just 10% money for traveling. Healthcare and clothing were paid less than other groups by four countries, persons in these nations only spent around 5% salary for wearing things, this happened the same with health care expenditures.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 65
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?（2018.12.01 89
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lthcare and clothing in the year 2009. General speaking, according to the cha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
... index in comparison to the other three group. As you can see, Japan spent aro...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n comparison to the other three group. As you can see, Japan spent around 23%...
^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries, this rate between 22% to 24%. On the other hand, transportation cost...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as regards, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26130653266 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79513550754 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623115577889 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3927782402 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174620815137 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717158232068 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411818629139 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10887526709 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383171914959 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.