The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart illustrates how many beds per thousand of people in hospitals, while the table highlights the government spending on health care and the average life expectancy in various countries.
At first glance, the more hospital beds one has, the higher life expectancy citizens are, while the less amount of expenditure on health per person.
On average, Japan ranks first in the number of hospital beds among eight regions, which accounts for around 14 beds for 1000 people. Next comes Germany, which occupies just over 8 beds for 1000 people, and this figure is nearly twice as high as this in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, the least number of hospital beds goes to the US, at just under 3 beds. In addition, there are around 4, 4, 3, and 4 beds in Australia, Canada, Spain, and the UK per 1000 people respectively.
Turning to the table, it is noticeable that while only $2581 spent on health care per person in Japan, there is the highest life expectancy (83 years) in this country. Conversely, the figure for money used for health in the US is about 3-fold as high as that in Japan, and the US has the lowest life expectancy, which makes up exactly 78 years. Besides, 3481 dollars are used for health to keep people alive until being 80 years old.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student Peers have more of an impact than teachers 84
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 73
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, if, nevertheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 222.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67567567568 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47252576406 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572072072072 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 290.88556701 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3441632599 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 76.5299724578 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 16.8248392259 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 4.34317383033 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0662662551995 0.216113520407 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287990002968 0.0766984524023 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346833741464 0.0603063233224 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519298486047 0.12726935374 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346730006755 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.