A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the use of others is rapidly declining.
Is it a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, language trend has become a controversial issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that the popularity and rarity of certain languages in various countries can be considered as a positive change. Nevertheless, I do not advocate that this trend makes perfect sense for some reasons.
On the one hand, certain languages are well-advised to be offered in different places to create more job opportunities. For example, bilingual and multi-bilingual people can get a permit to become stuff easier because they can apply to several countries not only in their own hometowns but also in oversea countries. Also, the benefit can be brought to certain places whose popular languages by broadening their images. Indeed, to avoid being isolated and lagging behind others, people will try hard to be proficient at these languages by learning theory and discovering cultures.
On the other hand, I am inclined that reducing in a few languages can take a heavy toll on people whose mother languages. Firstly, for someone who does not live in good financial health, they cannot join extra classes to enhance the level of expertise. This can hurt the development of these countries if they cannot exchange information with other prosperous countries. Secondly, it can lengthen the gap between the developed levels of countries in the world. To be more precise, overseas students will lag behind their friends unless they can understand the educational training written by widespread languages.
In conclusion, while the difference of using language trend can help people to get more chances to be employed and the whole countries can widen their images, I claim that its detriments outweigh its advantages for some aforementioned reasons. I suggest that people should know at least 2 languages apart from their mother tongues.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, apart from, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24324324324 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89113402547 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2116291982 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165949505043 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614188643841 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487482443613 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104704537289 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227114859434 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.