The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar graph illustrates that the portion of people from USA ate at fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013. It can be seen from the graphs that most of the people ate fast food once in a week or once in a month in the given time frame.
In 2013, almost one-third of the restaurant consumer ate at fast food joins at once or twice in a month, while in 2006 almost 33% of people ate once in a week. Similarly, approximately 31% people ate once in week in 2006.
In contrast, everyday eater at fast food joins were very less, near about 2.5% of the restaurant consumer through the given period. However, there are few people, roughly 5%, never consume any fast food. The 15% of consumers in 2006 and 2013 ate at least few time in a year, while near about 12% customer ate fast food in 2003. Interestingly, the one fifth of the consumer ate fast food several time a week in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- Write a letter to the hospital. In your letterexplain why you would like to do unpaid work at the hospital say what type of unpaid work you would be able to dogive details of when you would be available for this workYou should write at least 150 words 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?What is your opinion on that?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant eviden 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. You have had a similar problem in the past.Write a reply to your friend. In your letter:1.tell your friend you understand the problem2.explain what happened to you in the past3.Su 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...consumers in 2006 and 2013 ate at least few time in a year, while near about 12% custome...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, third, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 937.175257732 77% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31736526946 4.54256449028 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29935441569 2.54303337028 90% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 127.690721649 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.0926036221 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 4.34317383033 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339060744049 0.216113520407 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179544252429 0.0766984524023 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852155067406 0.0603063233224 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25740602137 0.12726935374 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443929500658 0.0580467560999 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 8.37731958763 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 8.71597938144 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.33 7.59969072165 83% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 41.2886597938 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.