The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015.
The given charts compare people in 3 different nations in terms of the dissimilarity in studying English from 2010 to 2015.
Overall, amongst 3 categories, the evening class witnessed a downward trend in the number of people taking part in for learning English while the figure for studying online experienced the opposite tendency. Additionally, the percentage of abroad had the most significant growth over the 5-year period shown.
Looking at the picture in more details, in 2010, the scale of people in country A registering evening class accounted for 70%, compared to 72% in country B and 94% in country C. During the same time-scale, country C had no people studying abroad while the figures for country A and B were 25% and 20% respectively. The percentage of learners studying online was the lowest in all countries, 5%, 8% and 6% respectively.
In 2015, there was a sharp decrease of 24% in the proportion of leaners choosing everning class in country A while the figures for country B and C declined marginally to 67% and 92% respectively. Conversely, the percentage of people studying online underwent a dramatical increase in country B, which was 4 times greater than that in the past 5 years, the figure for country A rose to 10% and 15% in country C. Whereas, the percentages for people going abroad in country A and B were about 20% while country C saw a small increase of only 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-27 | Nguyen Khanh | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give opinions 61
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in studying English from 2010 to 2015. Overall, amongst 3 categories, the eveni...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t growth over the 5-year period shown. Looking at the picture in more details, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 937.175257732 124% => OK
No of words: 241.0 206.0 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83817427386 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88666088659 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50622406639 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0977698011 44.8134815571 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.555555556 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 16.8248392259 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 4.34317383033 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268091864982 0.216113520407 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121784661359 0.0766984524023 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946884703587 0.0603063233224 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18979407502 0.12726935374 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092413901877 0.0580467560999 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 8.37731958763 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 8.71597938144 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.