Chorlewood witnessed the population growth since 1968 to 1944 in different part of the village. Interestingly this growth was not random but could be related to the accessibility of the area.
For example, the growth during 1868-1883 was mainly by the main road with small pocket of population. But it saw population increase in 1883-1922 in other area. This could be strongly related to Chorlewood Railway Station. The completion of railway in 1907 gave significant increase in population in the village, majorly near to the station area.
The above mentioned growth continues till 1907 and expanded mainly to the near by areas. But when the motorway built was completed, village have seen the growth in the new areas which were not able to attract more population until then. This growth could be primarily due to the development of motorway.
To recapitulate, the growth of population in Chorlewood village and the development of infrastructure causing ease of access cannot be differentiated and they have gone hand in hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...es till 1907 and expanded mainly to the near by areas. But when the motorway built was ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23952095808 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94719078483 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5131976776 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 76.5299724578 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 4.34317383033 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147001527985 0.216113520407 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635373101013 0.0766984524023 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513213393838 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092777962725 0.12726935374 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140323900128 0.0580467560999 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.