The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Line graph: https://imgur.com/a/Eh2mMhu
The line graph above illustrates the amounts of production waste of three business from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the total amounts of waste from company A and B is gradually declines over the years, which contradicts greatly from the inclination of company C. From the lowest starting position in the graph, company C manages to become the highest waste production company in 15 years.
In 2000, company A and B started at 12 tonnes and 8 tonnes of waste produced retrospectively while the number of company C was just over 3 tonnes. Over 5 years, company A experienced a slight declination and drop below 12 tonnes whereas both B and C equally rocketed at the same rate.
For the next 10 years, company A continued to lower its production of waste to under 9 tonnes. After reached its peak in 2005, company B amounts of produced wastes declined drastically and touched the lowest point compare to company A and C. And with the annual increasment over 15 years, company C becomes the biggest producer of waste in 2015.
- two tables about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries in 1994 and 2004 67
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- the diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Line graph: https://imgur.com/a/Eh2mMhu 73
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates the amounts of produc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71566455168 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 127.690721649 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.4558441227 44.8134815571 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 16.8248392259 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 4.34317383033 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.49484536082 535% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358371435752 0.216113520407 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175297622663 0.0766984524023 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502482859825 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222731300722 0.12726935374 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424941711159 0.0580467560999 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 8.37731958763 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 8.71597938144 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.