The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the levels of CO emissions in four major cities from April to August 2016.

There was a dramatic fall in emissions in both New York and London. New York's emissions dropped enormously from a high level of 100 metric tons in April to the lowest level of all four cities (approximately 5 tons) in August. Although there was a similar marked fall in emissions in London between April and June, from nearly 100 tons to just under 25 tons, London's CO emissions subsequently rose slightly.

In contrast, Sydney and Tokyo showed a relatively steady decline in emission over the four-month period. Looking at Sydney, CO emissions remained stable at around 65 tons from April to June, but they fell sharply over the rest of the period, finishing at about 40 tons. By comparison, Tokyo's emissions fell from 45 tons to 25 tons.

Overall, CO emissions decreased a great deal in all four cities.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 937.175257732 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 206.0 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82802547771 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53672765991 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 127.690721649 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 290.88556701 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2297952129 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 4.34317383033 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778331452824 0.216113520407 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434095696321 0.0766984524023 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0181985139318 0.0603063233224 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504814921924 0.12726935374 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102664128732 0.0580467560999 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.