The provided line graph illustrates the information regarding the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the four nations which are UK, Sweden, Italy any portugal during the year from 1967 to 2007. It is evident that the data is expressed in metric tonnes.
On analysing the graph it becomes lucod that in 1967, the emitted of CO2 per person in Portugal and Italy were just 1 and 5 metric timnes respectively. The Portugal rate increased sharply throughout in 1987 and it remained steadly throughout the next period.Afterthat, in the year 1997 to 2007, the emission of CO2 inclines slowly and it was stable at the end of period.
Switching on to the remaining figures that in early 1967, the UK’s amount of CO2 per person was nearly 11 metric tonnes. It was slight changes and it dramatically declined to 8 metric tonnes in 2007. In Sweden, the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person from 1967 to 2001 was nearly9 tonnes. However, it increased sharply in 1977 but it decreased in throughout the given period of time.
Hence, it is apparent that United Kingdom produced the largest amounts of gas throughout the years 1967 to 2007. Whereas, the Portugal emitted CO2 per person amount of minimum.
- At the present time. the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Unemployment is a growing problem all over the world. What are the causes of this ? What could be done to help tackle this issue? 61
- research in the field of science and technology is of utmost significance as it leads to breakthrough inventions. It os highly debatable issue whether government should do the spending on scientific research purposes or private companies should take the i 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that a huge a mount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterthat
...ined steadly throughout the next period.Afterthat, in the year 1997 to 2007, the emission...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ut it decreased in throughout the given period of time. Hence, it is apparent that United K...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... gas throughout the years 1967 to 2007. Whereas, the Portugal emitted CO2 per person am...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 32.9175257732 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 206.0 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89903846154 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65460813336 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0984933873 44.8134815571 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 4.34317383033 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303706643826 0.216113520407 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124420802212 0.0766984524023 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100964145921 0.0603063233224 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199657072808 0.12726935374 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377561743056 0.0580467560999 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 70.7449484536 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.