The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
The line graph depicts the proportion of novel technology used by the UK residents, namely home computer, mobile phone, CD player, and internet access over the period from 1996 to 2003.
Overall, the figure of all had an upward trend over the period given. Moreover, CD player made up the biggest share while the Internet was the least. In addition, the access to the Internet was two years later than the others.
From 1996 to 1999, there was a marginal increase in the percentage of CD players, from approximately 60% to nearly 65%. Similarly, the access to home computer and mobile phone swelled to around 29% and 25%, respectively. In 1999 the Internet first appeared and only accounted for just above 10%.
The period between 1999 and 2003 witnessed a rapid growth in access to the four listed features. While the percentage of CD player rose gradually, standing at around 80% in 2003, that of the others boomed quickly. As can be seen from the graph, the access to home computer and the internet surged remarkably by nearly 20% and 35% in 2003, respectively. Meanwhile, the percentage of mobile phone was erratic and doubled to 70% in 2003.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 82
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of 89
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 87
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children while others feel it should be purely optional Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion You should give reasons for your answer and include ideas and examples fr 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, similarly, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84848484848 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52684798084 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3275752602 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2727272727 76.5299724578 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 16.8248392259 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146463366191 0.216113520407 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545033002413 0.0766984524023 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05123782373 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967485173043 0.12726935374 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544167701921 0.0580467560999 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 8.37731958763 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.