Internet Users as percentage of population
The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009. It is clear that the proportion of the population who used the Internet increased in each country over the period shown.
Overall, a much larger percentage of Canadians and Americans had access to the Internet in comparison with Mexicans, and Canada experienced the fastest growth in Internet usage.
In 1999, the proportion of people using the Internet in the USA was about 20%. The figures for Canada and Mexico were lower, at about 10% and 5% respectively. In 2005, Internet usage in both the USA and Canada rose to around 70% of the population, while the figure for Mexico reached just over 25%.
By 2009, the percentage of Internet users was highest in Canada. Almost 100% of Canadians used the Internet, compared to about 80% of Americans and only 40% of Mexicans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-15 | Lê Nguyễn Quỳnh Trang | view | |
| 2023-04-15 | Lê Nguyễn Quỳnh Trang | view | |
| 2022-06-07 | sandranguyenanh04 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | kushang | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | Baonhi | 61 | view |
- the table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela 1999 70
- the chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 83
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 78
- Even though globalization affect the world’s economic in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of Americans and only 40% of Mexicans.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 937.175257732 79% => OK
No of words: 151.0 206.0 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91390728477 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58223801381 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 290.88556701 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5775848636 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 4.34317383033 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339135950725 0.216113520407 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14968117786 0.0766984524023 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116578542763 0.0603063233224 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204861310338 0.12726935374 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809660587381 0.0580467560999 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.