the table below shows the amount of waste production ( millions of tons) in six different countries over the twenty year period. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares data on the level of waste production in six separate countries throughout a twenty-year period.
Overall, while Korea saw an significant decrease in the amount of waste discharge, the five countries remainder experienced downward trend. However, US is the largest countries producing waste over most years.
In 1980, US discharged 131 millions of tones waste, which is the highest amount, followed by Japan, with 103 less millions of tons. Likewise, Poland contributed 4 millions of tons doubling the amount of waste in Portugal, which constituted 2 millions of tons. By contrast, only 0.6 millions of tons was produced in Ireland making it the lowest figure at the same period.
According to the table, it can be clearly to seen that the level of waste in US continued grow exponentially to 192 millions of tons in 2000 and remained the first ranking throughout a twenty-year period. On the contrary, a remarkable fall was observed in the amount of waste in Korea from 31 millions of ton in 1990 to 19 millions of tons in 2000. Besides, Japan produced more 21 millions of tons, compared to more 2.6 millions of ton in Poland at the end of the given period. Additionally, starting at the lowest point in 1980, Ireland increased considerably in the level of waste, which was ending the same figure at the end of recorded year, at 5 millions of tons.
- People think that children nowadays have more freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 61
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 61
- Even though globalization affect the world’s economic in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ear period. Overall, while Korea saw an significant decrease in the amount of w...
^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '131 million'.
Suggestion: 131 million
...r most years. In 1980, US discharged 131 millions of tones waste, which is the highest amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun millions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...est amount, followed by Japan, with 103 less millions of tons. Likewise, Poland cont...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...s of tons. Likewise, Poland contributed 4 millions of tons doubling the amount of waste in Po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...of waste in Portugal, which constituted 2 millions of tons. By contrast, only 0.6 millions of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...2 millions of tons. By contrast, only 0.6 millions of tons was produced in Ireland making it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '192 million'.
Suggestion: 192 million
...e in US continued grow exponentially to 192 millions of tons in 2000 and remained the first ran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '31 million'.
Suggestion: 31 million
...ed in the amount of waste in Korea from 31 millions of ton in 1990 to 19 millions of tons in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '19 million'.
Suggestion: 19 million
...orea from 31 millions of ton in 1990 to 19 millions of tons in 2000. Besides, Japan produced m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '21 million'.
Suggestion: 21 million
...s in 2000. Besides, Japan produced more 21 millions of tons, compared to more 2.6 millions of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...21 millions of tons, compared to more 2.6 millions of ton in Poland at the end of the given p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 650, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
... figure at the end of recorded year, at 5 millions of tons.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, likewise, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 26.3917525773 197% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 234.0 206.0 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79332924838 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517094017094 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 290.88556701 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5682922762 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 76.5299724578 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 16.8248392259 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 4.34317383033 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 2.54639175258 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.49484536082 535% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281249547191 0.216113520407 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128977561564 0.0766984524023 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656598316925 0.0603063233224 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19432395179 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605288135387 0.0580467560999 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.