The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015
The line graph illustrates the regional household recycling rates in the UK, Germany and France from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, it is noticeable that the recycling rates of the UK and Germany had an upward trend. However the rate of France showed a downward trend over the given period.
While, the rates of the UK and Germany were at about 35% and 20% respectively, the recycling rate of France was at 50% in the beginning of the given period. The recycling rate of Germany increased significantly to approximately 35% in 2009. By contrast, the rate of the UK remained stable at 40% in this year, after a slight increase by 5% in 2007. While the recycling rate of the UK had a significant growth to nearly 60%, the rate of Germany grew up rapidly to about 57% by 2015.
When it comes to the recycling rate of France, although, it was at the highest point in 2005, it increased modestly to 70%, after it had declined dramatically by 20% in 2013, being the lowest among the three rates in the end of the period.
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this problem be solved 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 100
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers 67
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 73
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this problem be solved 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the regional ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Germany and France from 2005 to 2015. Overall, it is noticeable that the recyc...
^^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...the UK and Germany had an upward trend. However the rate of France showed a downward tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... downward trend over the given period. While, the rates of the UK and Germany w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were at about 35% and 20% respectively, the recycling rate of France was at 50% ...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately 35% in 2009. By contrast, the rate of the UK remained stable at 40...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grew up rapidly to about 57% by 2015. When it comes to the recycling rate of F...
^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t comes to the recycling rate of France, although, it was at the highest point i...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the recycling rate of France, although, it was at the highest point in 2005, it ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49456521739 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60406631817 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483695652174 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5357237506 44.8134815571 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 16.8248392259 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 4.34317383033 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 2.54639175258 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273817712663 0.216113520407 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139893461184 0.0766984524023 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932338821053 0.0603063233224 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201473212556 0.12726935374 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983130869582 0.0580467560999 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 8.37731958763 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 8.71597938144 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 7.59969072165 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.