the line graph indicates the values of Australia's trade with China, Japan, and the US from 2002 to 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart illustrates the information about the worth of Australia’s business associated with 3 nations, namely, China, Japan, and the US during the period from 2002 to 2008.
Generally, the import of Australia with countries has an upward trend while the export has a dramatic fluctuation with each country.
It can be seen from the line graphs, Australia ‘s export with nations has a fluctuated change. With China, the export tended downward, the figure shows in 2002, reached at 43AU$ and fell gradually to under 38AU$ in 2008. About Australia ‘s export with Japan, in 2002, at 40 Au$ and rose slightly. From 2005 to 2008, the movement of export fluctuated dramatically, which peaked at 65Au$ and decreased then. Glancing at the third chart, it is obvious to see that the export of Australia with the US has stable growth through every period.
The import of Australia with China in 2002, reached at 30Au$ after that 3-year, there was a slight decrease, the number in this time about 20AuS. Between 2005 and 2008, the number of import of Australia with China increased significantly, over 42Au$. During the period from 2002 to 2008, the values of Australia’s import with Japan and the US had a stability, around 37Au$ and 22Au$, respectively.
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 82
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disargee? 73
- the charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sitdown restaurant 89
- Computers do not help children learn more effectively On the contrary the use of computers has a negative effect on children s physical and mental development To what exten do you agree or disargee 82
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lia with China in 2002, reached at 30Au$ after that 3-year, there was a slight de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04739336493 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72949576325 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 1.44329896907 624% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.451537744 44.8134815571 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 4.34317383033 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323944719816 0.216113520407 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154240674015 0.0766984524023 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829419088446 0.0603063233224 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221374389975 0.12726935374 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895759883576 0.0580467560999 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.