The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The chart depicts data about how many cars were stolen for a thousand means of transport in four countries during the 10 years since 1990.
Overall, the number of cars stolen in Canada and Great Britain decreased, while those in Sweden increased, except for France, which remained stable over the period given. In addition, the UK had the highest number of thefts in the whole period.
It is clearly visible from the line chart that Great Britain’s figure varied consistently during the period, starting at 18 car-theft cases per thousand means of transport in the UK, fluctuating in the first six years between 17 and 20, before falling to 16 in the last year. According to Canadian data, it declined from 8 to 5 between 1990 and 1993, then steadily rose to 7 in 1999.
In contrast, in the first five years, the figure for Sweden fluctuated around 7. In the following year, it had a slight growth of 12 and remained stable at this number for the next three years. In the final year, it rose significantly to 14. Similarly, the figure for France was erratic between 6 and 7 the whole time. However, it returned to the initial number in the last year, at 6.
- Nowadays more and more people from different cities are spending more time away from their families What are the possible reasons and the effects on the people themselves and their fami lies 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 56
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t this number for the next three years. In the final year, it rose significantly t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, then, while, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61352657005 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43789579361 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589371980676 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 1.44329896907 624% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.346250862 44.8134815571 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 76.5299724578 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 4.34317383033 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1036810499 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384702866011 0.0766984524023 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444251720855 0.0603063233224 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687456548196 0.12726935374 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534116685066 0.0580467560999 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.