Percentage of national consumer expenditure
The table compares percentage of national expenditure consuming from five countries in terms of their three items in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion for five country were consistently highest about food/drinks/tobacco. In addition, clothing/footwear and leisure/education were lower data of each countries.
Almost people in five countries, they consumed a large amount of Food/drinks/tobacco. By the way, percentage of turkey and Ireland consumed expenditure was considerably gap with 32.14% and 28.91% respectively compared to remained one. Proportion of cost of rest countries was similar with 16.36% in Italy, 18.80% in spain and 15.77% in Sweden.
In contrast, this countries' people rarely paid to clothing/footwear and leisure/education. Table of data showed us that clothing/footwear's percentage were lower than Food/drinks/tobacco's proportion. Particularly, Italy occupied large rate 9.00% compared to 6.43%, 6.51%, 5.4% and 6.63% for Ireland, spain, Sweden and turkey corresponding coupled with leisure/education just only displayed quite small figures in turn 2.21%, 3.20%, 1.98%, 3.22%, and 4.35% according to above mention countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2023-10-17 | hungthetroller2008@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | within_24 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Nancysachdeva | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...clothing/footwear and leisure/education were lower data of each countries. Almost p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in addition, in contrast, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 937.175257732 107% => OK
No of words: 164.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11585365854 4.54256449028 135% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.97420201771 2.54303337028 156% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.622605031667 108% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2821847917 44.8134815571 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 76.5299724578 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 4.34317383033 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203050373644 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891987534287 0.0766984524023 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135234849686 0.0603063233224 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156965058105 0.12726935374 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161904047565 0.0580467560999 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 8.37731958763 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 8.71597938144 209% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.