The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparisons where revelant.
The pie chart is presented to point out the downfall of productivity in cultivating plants and livestock. Furthermore, this had has negative effects on the surface in North America, Europe and Oceania, respectively in the 1990s which has been shown on the table.
Overall, over-grazing had out-numbered three categories including deforestation, over-cultivation, and other miscellaneous factors. On the same hand, the total percentage of land degradation in Europe is the highest on the list.
The significant majority of worldwide degradation is over-grazing with 35%. Another factor that contributed to the given situation is deforestation which made up 30% of the bar chart. By contrast, another trivial matter is only 7%. In the same period, deforestation and over-cultivation were playing a vital role in the amount of land being degraded in Europe for 9.8% and 7.7%. On the contrary, over-grazing in Oceania took a significant proportion exactly for 11.3%.
It is clear that looking at the table and the bar chart simultaneously all three regions had a fairly high percentage in over-grazing and this is the cause for the considerable fraction in worldwide land degradation.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give you own opinion 63
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 937.175257732 107% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 4.54256449028 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45800829395 2.54303337028 136% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 290.88556701 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2676484921 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 16.8248392259 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 4.34317383033 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890798373578 0.216113520407 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033258667782 0.0766984524023 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380037476384 0.0603063233224 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621586494711 0.12726935374 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377810301384 0.0580467560999 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.