The pie charts below show the comparison of carbohydrates, protein, fat of three different diets: average diet, healthy diet for sport, and healthy diet.
The pie charts below show the comparison of carbohydrates, protein, fat of three different diets: average diet, healthy diet for sport, and healthy diet.
Overall, carbohydrates have the largest proportion in each diet especially in a healthy diet for sport. And fat was the lowest share of the diet.
On the average diet, the number of carbohydrates and protein accounted for the highest proportion, at 40% of the total. The amount of fat was slightly lower, at 20%.
In a healthy diet, the rate of carbohydrates is 50%, it's the most higher percentage in the pie chart of a healthy diet. Protein and fat take up less than only 30% & 20%.
In a Healthy diet for sports, with a sports training regimen, the percentage of carbohydrates accounts for the highest of all three diets at 60%. Amount of protein, 25%, less than those who eat a healthy diet, 15%. Finally, the number of fat accounts for only 15% of it at least.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-04-01 | Bao Anh b2108181 | 73 | view |
- To what extent do you agree with the statement English should not be taught in class Students can learn English with resources online by themselves 56
- The bar chart shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of carbohydrates protein fat of three different diets average diet healthy diet for sport and healthy diet 73
- Review Book 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...htly lower, at 20%. In a healthy diet, the rate of carbohydrates is 50%, its th...
^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...iet, the rate of carbohydrates is 50%, its the most higher percentage in the pie c...
^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e rate of carbohydrates is 50%, its the most higher percentage in the pie chart of a health...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 937.175257732 81% => OK
No of words: 162.0 206.0 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70987654321 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71150375719 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2070889272 44.8134815571 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3 76.5299724578 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 16.8248392259 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 4.34317383033 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.738164668988 0.216113520407 342% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.316096876766 0.0766984524023 412% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245708624051 0.0603063233224 407% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.489016053904 0.12726935374 384% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2205930287 0.0580467560999 380% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 8.37731958763 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 70.7449484536 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 7.45979381443 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 8.71597938144 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 7.59969072165 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 41.2886597938 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.