Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why?
Roads are the most common way to connect places together and public transports are the most popular method that people use to arrive to their destination. But witch one is more important to enhance by governments? I will explain both of these and in the end I will discuss my own point view.
Roads are the icon of development and also the reason of development. In many developed countries there are very high-tech and very safe roads and highways. For instance, in Germany some highways don’t have any speed limitation and this is because of very modern engineering that happened on those and these modern highways lead to make the fastest transportation in the world. Also the most common users of the roads are people who wants to travel from A point to B point and when a country has the fastest and safest highways, members of public can drive on them safely and this can lead to a better society.
Public transportation is essential for any modern community that want to develop. First of all, public transportation can make the travel cheaper and easier. For instance, in many of mega cities around the world there are limited area that people cannot drive in by their own car. And this is because of reduce traffic in those areas. So in this situation the best and only solution is public transportation. Secondary, in these days because of environmental problems all governments encourage their people to use public transportation to reduce greenhouse gases and stop global warming and I think the best way to reach this goal is subways. Because sub ways use electricity that is the purest power source in the world.
To make short the long story, I think governments must spend their money in public transportation because of environmental issues that I mentioned above. But this is essential that governments must improve their current roads and make them safer.
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. 88
- Around the world, solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households. Why do you think this is so? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using solar energy to power one’s home? 88
- You work in a busy but poorly organised office and you are keen to be promoted. Your employer needs to find a new supervisor for your department.Write a letter to your employer. In the letter ask to be considered for this job explain why you would b 78
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...are the most popular method that people use to arrive to their destination. But wit...
^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e fastest transportation in the world. Also the most common users of the roads are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...best way to reach this goal is subways. Because sub ways use electricity that is the pu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 32.9175257732 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.85567010309 389% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 937.175257732 167% => OK
No of words: 320.0 206.0 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.890625 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75976780896 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 127.690721649 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4875 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 290.88556701 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5484755599 44.8134815571 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8125 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 4.34317383033 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188311220203 0.216113520407 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625138582565 0.0766984524023 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062484780222 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126634303867 0.12726935374 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726219955482 0.0580467560999 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 8.71597938144 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.