Some people feel the best way to reduce the number of accidents on the road is to further limit the speed of vehicles. Others think that there are better ways to tackle this issue. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the number of individuals being died by car wrecks is remain stable. While some people believe that the restricting of speed can solve it effectively, I side with this who feel that it have various methods to address these said issues.
On the one hand, driving vehicles with misconducted speed is the main reason causing the road injuries, so setting the regulation for the commuters about the restriction of quickness ought to considerably plunge the amounts of the incidents on boulevards. In other word, the ceiling on the speed support people to control the car more sensible, which will absolutely minimize the inclination of hit-and-run. Take Vietnam for example. 36% of the total deaths by accident cause on the national highway due to the high speed and transport densities at there. Therefore, supporter of issuing a maximal velocity argue that it is the best way to minimal collision on the road.
On the other hand, although restricting speedy driving is debating as the effective method to control the road injuries, there are many ways to address it. One of them is setting legislation and order to punish any individuals who break the rules, so the chauffeur needs to ensure the law enforcement to avoid any vulnerable situation. Take using smart phone and drinking alcohol for instance. There are the major cause which lead to car crashes that can be punished by paying fines. As a result, obey the law and rules might change the nonacceptance behavior of the driver and surge the boulevards incident.
To sum up, although some experts believe that the best way to go down the road injuries is limited the maximum street, supporter of setting legislation argue that it can address this dillemma more effectively than other methods. However, I completely believe that the regulation and order will decline the amount of car crashes.
- Some people think that students should learn a range of practical skills at school such as car maintenance or managing money alongside traditional subjects like maths and physics Do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- You have been looking after your friend s house while they were on holiday However you have forgotten to do something that they asked you to do before they left Write a letter to your friend In your letter Apologise to your friend Explain how you forgot t
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefit Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 73
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to this friend In your letter Give details of your study plans Explain why you w
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...individuals being died by car wrecks is remain stable. While some people believe that ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t-and-run. Take Vietnam for example. 36% of the total deaths by accident cause on...
^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...porter of setting legislation argue that it can address this dillemma more effect...
^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will decline the amount of car crashes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 937.175257732 166% => OK
No of words: 309.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02912621359 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70023177943 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 127.690721649 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0662487361 44.8134815571 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190760656804 0.216113520407 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549407092316 0.0766984524023 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596862041628 0.0603063233224 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113164742245 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410211026191 0.0580467560999 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.