Some people think that air travel should grow without a limit, while others believe that governments should limit it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The recent boom in aviation industry has caused a growing disagreement between many experts that whether it should be greatly reduced, or even cut off altogether by the governments, or the authorities should not cause this emerging industry any trouble. Although both sides have valid points, I think any government intervention should be strictly avoided.
Proponents of imposing restrictions on air travel believe this industry poses a great threat to the environment by producing emissions in the upper atmosphere. They propose preventive measures like imposition of taxes, to tackle this issue. While it is true that aircraft engines exhaust fumes that causes pollution, but there is no viable alternative to usage of airplanes, which can be less energy-intensive and more efficient. Other means of transport like trains and cars, are much less environmental-friendly. A recent study by National Energy Organization of Iran (NEOI) indicated that co2 emissions caused by cars, is the leading cause of environmental pollution within the Middle East.
Another point to consider is, the role of government in the modern economy and society must be limited. Any intervention by governments might favor state-owned corporations that are currently active in the regional transportation market. For example, in the 2015, a scandal revealed by one of the Iranian newspaper, that partial restriction of airlines was due to a fraud plot, to shift the market towards government-sponsored railway companies. Needless to say that governments introduced such schemes as a national effort to curb environmental pollution at first.
To conclude, while there has been problems associated with the rising air travel in the past few years, we must bear in mind that there is no feasible option to using airplanes. Furthermore, security regulations are needed from the government to ensure the safety of our flights, but any further economic intervention can worsen the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | prajwal mukkawar | 92 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.85567010309 467% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 937.175257732 177% => OK
No of words: 303.0 206.0 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48514851485 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29685625764 2.54303337028 130% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 127.690721649 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653465346535 0.622605031667 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 290.88556701 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6377409382 44.8134815571 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 76.5299724578 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 16.8248392259 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149936033117 0.216113520407 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462678105135 0.0766984524023 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405340783973 0.0603063233224 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828270463826 0.12726935374 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389838518437 0.0580467560999 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 8.37731958763 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 70.7449484536 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 8.71597938144 170% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 7.59969072165 137% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 41.2886597938 262% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.