Some working parents believe children centers can provide the best care for children, while others think that other family members like grandparents can do this job. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, a large number of kids are sent to kindergartens for more professional care. Some people claim that children should be taken care of by their family because of the more attentive care. On the contrary, some people hold this view that children could be provided the better service at children centers than at home. However, in my opinion, kids should be taken care of by the family.
The children centers have certain advantages in providing professional care. This because there is a team of professional high-skilled caregivers with an educational course prepared carefully. By contrast, family members rely on their abundant experience to look after their babies. For instance, the trained caregivers could offer the reasonable meal and the nourishment of the well balanced. The healthful diet is effective for improve the kids’ body quality. Therefore, the kid will not acquire reasonable meal if they look after by their grandparents, because their relatives only provide what they think is nutritious food, which is often meat, eggs and milk.
The family member could provide more careful care for their children. This is because family member do not have to be responsible for a numerous of children, they can pay more attention for their child for the sake of the health of their baby. For example, if their baby gets severe diseases, such as fever, grandparents can divert all day on taking care of them. Meanwhile the children taken care by their grandparents would become more closer to their family and it can preserve our traditional family culture values.
In conclusion, it is obvious that children centers have certain advantages in providing professional care. However, we cannot deny that the fact that the family member could provide more careful care for their children. Therefore, children should be taken care by their family members.
- Some people claim that censorship is necessary because there are too many undesirable contents in the mass media, while others argue that it will hinder information freedom. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some working parents believe children centers can provide the best care for children, while others think that other family members like grandparents can do this job. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In recent years, a large number of kids are sent to kindergartens for more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'center'.
Suggestion: center
...en care of by the family. The children centers have certain advantages in providing pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... divert all day on taking care of them. Meanwhile the children taken care by their grandp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...care by their grandparents would become more closer to their family and it can preserve our...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 4.92783505155 264% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 937.175257732 168% => OK
No of words: 304.0 206.0 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19407894737 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69163181707 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 127.690721649 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 290.88556701 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4114872354 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8823529412 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 4.34317383033 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 7.41237113402 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289938494959 0.216113520407 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11813198955 0.0766984524023 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737063506261 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205263072878 0.12726935374 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615230131409 0.0580467560999 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 7.59969072165 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.