The tables below give the information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050

Essay topics:

The tables below give the information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050.

The given tabular charts illustrate the information about the world population and distribution categorized by six different countries: Africa, Asia,
Europe, Latin America, North Amercia and Oceania during the year 1950 to 2050 in the regions. The data is celebrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently representation.

It can be seen that, the worlds total population in 1950 were 2.5 billions which was categorised in six countries as: 9% in Africa, 56% in Asia, 22% in Europe, and afterthat, it was decreased as in Latin America the populater were 6%, in North America it was 7% and at last, the least population were is in Oceania which was less than 1%.

On other hand, the world population in 2000 were 6.5 billion in which 13% were in Africa, 60% were in Asia and 12% were in Europe. Moreover, in Latin America population was 9%, in North America population was 5% and in Oceania the population were only 1%. Furthermore, in 2050, the total population will be 9.0 billion as estimate. Apart from that, the population in Africa will be 20%, 50% in Asia and 7% in Europe. At the last, in Latin America, North America and in Oceania, the population will be 9%, 4% and 1% respectively.

Overall it is evident that, Asia is the most populated country and on the other hand, Oceania is the very least populated country from all the countries.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (16 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-16 kaur meet 59 view
Essays by user kaur meet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y six different countries: Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, North Amercia and...
^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een that, the worlds total population in 1950 were 2.5 billions which was categor...
^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 12% were in Europe. Moreover, in Latin America population was 9%, in North Amer...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, apart from, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.48453608247 321% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 937.175257732 120% => OK
No of words: 235.0 206.0 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80425531915 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74030659184 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451063829787 0.622605031667 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 290.88556701 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8440450634 44.8134815571 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 76.5299724578 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 16.8248392259 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 4.34317383033 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157670562694 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078064688154 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058030622711 0.0603063233224 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103715826472 0.12726935374 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535795664354 0.0580467560999 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 70.7449484536 76% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 3.82989690722 339% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 8.62886597938 243% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.