your local TV station is organising the burial of a 'time capsule'. Suggestions are being welcomed as to what artefacts should be buried with the capsule to enable future generations to understand more about today's society.
write an email to the TV station. in your email - suggest at least 3 artefacts, say why they are relevant & explain why they are also practical suggestions
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing this email in order to provide my valuable suggestions and opinion for the event of burial of 'time capsule' that is being organised by your TV station. I am pretty sure that this TV program will definitely be comprehended by the future generation.
First and foremost, I would like to appreciate you for having such a unique TV program that is to be showcased to the world. As per your request to public, I would like to recommend some artefacts of our present era which are already obsolete and the posterity would never have chance to either use or see them physically.
In my opinion, these are few artefacts which definitely deserve to be part of the time capsule. Firstly, video tapes which was one of the first source of entertainment to the families around the world before CD & DVD's came into existence. Secondly radio which is already rare to find in any electronic stores around the world was quite famous for its entertaining purpose. Finally one of the most favorite and technical device of present era that is now nowhere to be found is floppy disk. It was a huge hit before USB and memory cards came into existence.
I believe these artefacts had made our lives quite simple as well entertaining. These aforementioned artefacts definitely deserve to be part of this burial and express our lifestyle to the posterity.
I hope my inputs would be of some use for this upcoming event. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Yours faithfully,
Harpreet
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-29 | harpreet93 | 89 | view |
- appearance isn t everything discuss 74
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment books is a waste of time for children they should only read educational books What is your opinion Give your reasons and include your own or relative experience 71
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omprehended by the future generation. First and foremost, I would like to appr...
^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...reciate you for having such a unique TV program that is to be showcased to the world. A...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...te famous for its entertaining purpose. Finally one of the most favorite and technical ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 32.9175257732 97% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 937.175257732 134% => OK
No of words: 261.0 206.0 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81609195402 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6994340581 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 127.690721649 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 290.88556701 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0735963082 44.8134815571 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 76.5299724578 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 16.8248392259 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 4.34317383033 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 7.41237113402 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162059719718 0.216113520407 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560743127263 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608669613103 0.0603063233224 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937094363736 0.12726935374 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801206369467 0.0580467560999 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.0786516854 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.