It is important for travelers and business people to understand the cultures they come into contact with, however briefly. What are the main advantages of doing so? What do you think is the main disadvantage of not doing so?
It is self-contradictory that these days the number of people who are willing to travel to other countries for running a business or sightseeing has been increased considerably. It is also worth considering that being familiar with the cultures of people in the host country makes a myriad of gains as well as handicaps that could be caused by a paucity of information about social background of people in the destination.
The first point that deserves consideration is that travelers can benefit from knowing the language and some qualities of people in the country that they are going to. In simple terms, they can communicate with people straightforwardly and the more visitors have awareness of the cultures, the more they can enjoy their trips. On the other hand, if travelers do not know anything about some taboos in the host society they have to contend with some catastrophes. Take for example a visitor who makes a gesture that has a pleasant meaning in their own culture but in the host society is too insulting and reprehensible and as a result the person has to quarrel with citizens instead of enjoying their time.
Nevertheless, a businessman who wants to make a profit and run a lucrative business in another country ought to have some knowledge about interests and aspects of people in that country. Otherwise, he cannot be successful. For instance, a person who imports some conservative clothes into a country whose people are not religious. Consequently, everything goes badly and he cannot sell anything.
In a nutshell, it is essential for visitors and business people to get to know and be familiar with some aspects of people’s personalities in the host country to be able to enjoy their journeys and run a profitable business.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-06 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
2019-03-14 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 89 | view |
- Damage of the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- some people think that Genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 70
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- It is important for travelers and business people to understand the cultures they come into contact with, however briefly. What are the main advantages of doing so? What do you think is the main disadvantage of not doing so? 70
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 70
Comments
hello. Thanks for your
hello. Thanks for your correction. I used "their" instead of "his" because the sex of the visitor was not clear.
With best regards
so it should be: visitors
so it should be:
visitors who make a gesture that has a pleasant meaning in their own culture
a visitor who makes a gesture that has a pleasant meaning in their own culture
a visitor who makes a gesture that has a pleasant meaning in his own culture
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 294 350
No. of Characters: 1437 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.141 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.888 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.949 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.727 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.256 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.606 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5