In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
In many large cities around the world, the number of cars has increasing to an alarming rates. this large number of cars causes a lot of problems such as pollution, traffic congestion and so on. One of the possible solution by the government is tax on private car drivers. As the case with many policies, there are pros and cons for this policy.
First and foremost, by putting tax on every private car, many people will try to avoid using their cars, and resorting more on public transportation. Consequently, this will lead to less traffic problems and less pollution. Moreover, governments could use this money to improve public transportation. In my city for example, no body prefer to use public buses, that because of miserable condition of public buses. thus, using the tax money to improve these buses will be a lucrative idea.
On the other hand, the thorny side of this policy is putting more burden on the poor people. In other words, usually the private car owners are from the poor people, due to the fact that, they use these car to earn 'bread and butter' for their families. hence, this tax undoubtedly will worsen their condition. In addition to this, the tax is mostly fixed, that means the same amount of money will taken from car owners. To be more specific, the rich people will not effected by this tax, it is not fair to put same tax on different kinds of people.
In conclusion, it is clearly obvious that this policy related to many pros and cons. But improving public transportation is fruitful task for every country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Mohammadreza.gh | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Jasneet | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Omfiann | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | anhvu010197@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- In general people live longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 70
- In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution? 60
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 87
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 80
One of the possible solution by the government is tax on private car drivers
One of the possible solutions by the government is to tax on private car drivers
no body prefer to use public buses
no body prefers to use public buses
that this policy related to many pros and cons
that this policy is related to many pros and cons
But improving public transportation is fruitful task for every country.
But improving public transportation is a fruitful task for every country.
Sentence: In addition to this, the tax is mostly fixed, that means the same amount of money will taken from car owners.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to will and taken
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Different Words: 135 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 271 350
No. of Characters: 1232 1500
No. of Different Words: 135 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.546 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.375 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.526 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.058 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5