Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nowadays, the salaries are based on a number of criteria such as qualification and experiences, but this got questioned by certain society. It is believed that, the certain professions (nurses, doctors and teachers) have underpaid by the societies, compared to actors or company bosses.
Some people would believe that certain professions might get undervalued according to the criteria, while some people would claim that specialists should get higher salaries compared to those who get paid in a lump sum. However, this is a seldom case. Those expertises are unique in value and those job opportunities are always demanding. Not all the professions even for film actors or CEOs could acquire a lot of money. Sometimes the passion for the job and the amount of time invested to complete the task would not reflect in the amount of payments. These factors cannot be measured as a number. The measurement for salary settlement is a questionable while the payment for a certain professions might undervalued.
To set the criteria for salary is difficult. Until now, there are several criteria have been used by a society. Qualification has long been used as a yardstick, but this found to be not good. The reason for this is, some people might have a great qualification but might not be suitable for the company’s perspective or its environment. Another measure is, relevant years of experiences. However, this also not a good measure either as sometimes younger person can perform better than someone with lots of experience.
I believe that some certain professions get under paid compared to other professions. Therefore, their payment should get evaluated in a consistent basis by an independent body.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-02 | hoangnm | 73 | view |
2019-08-12 | Shrasth Kumar | 67 | view |
2018-08-09 | zohre-h | 60 | view |
2017-10-08 | BLACK WOLF | 61 | view |
2016-09-12 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart indicates a survey on two different age groups on the factors contributing to make their environment pleasant for working The survey was carried out on two groups of workers those aged from 18 30 and those aged 45 60 and shows factors affect 84
- The barchart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categories, from 2001- 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- Some people think that, it is interesting to see scientists use living animal to carry out research. Other people believe that, it is cruel. Do you agree or disagree with this? 50
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 70
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
is a questionable
is questionable
there are several criteria have been used
there are several criteria which have been used
Sentence: However, this is a seldom case.
Description: The fragment a seldom case is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace seldom with adjective
Sentence: The measurement for salary settlement is a questionable while the payment for a certain professions might undervalued.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to might and undervalued
Sentence: Those expertises are unique in value and those job opportunities are always demanding.
Error: expertises Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 277 350
No. of Characters: 1393 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.08 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.029 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.857 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.294 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.41 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.287 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.477 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5